UN vs. Individual Rights
The United Nations works to annihilate the concept
of individual rights
Declaration of Rights Destroys Rights
Individual rights are precisely
what the UN's declaration is designed to destroy. No, it doesn't openly attack
individual rights; that would be rejected outright by freer countries. It
destroys rights by internal corruption — by perverting the meaning of rights
into its exact opposite.
The Moral Bankruptcy of the U.N. Human Rights Commission
The re-election of Sudan to the U.N. Human Rights Commission--chaired by
terrorist-sponsoring Libya in 2003--demonstrates once again the total moral
bankruptcy of the United Nations.
Nations United Against Rights
Consider the meaning of the rights commission vote.
The UN voted not to reappoint the United States to its seat on the commission
... but in the same vote, it gave a seat to Sudan, a country that tolerates the
practice of slavery.
United Nations Sham: Libyan leader Colonel Gadaffi to Head the U.N. Human Rights
Even the most creative scriptwriter couldn't top the
real-life plot twist the U.N. Commission on Human Rights will have concocted
when Libya becomes its chairman.
versus "Human Rights"
The United Nations is becoming more a danger to human
rights enforcement than a defender of such rights.
United States Should Withdraw From the United Nations
If America really cares about human rights, the best
thing it can do is to take this opportunity and withdraw from the United
Liberty League: An Alternative to the United Nations
This "Liberty League" could then know for certain that all of its member states
are truly committed to the same goals, namely the preservation of their
sovereignty, international free trade, the protection of private property, and
the protection of individual rights.
UN Prolongs the Middle East Conflict
The United Nations punishes Israel because it is a free
U.N. Call for Palestinian State
Spells Suicide for Palestinians
Arafat's "Palestinian self-determination" really means more of Arafat's
despotism—it means granting legitimacy to a state that is utterly hostile to its
United Nation's War Against Israel
In the United Nation's General Assembly, 429 anti-Israel resolutions were passed
from 1967 to 1988. Israel was "condemned" 321 times. Arab nations? Not once.
The United Nations works to entrench and reward racism
under the guise of opposing it.
United Nations Conference of Racists
The UN World Conference Against Racism has met and taken up its primary agenda:
the praise and protection of racists. The tone was set on the first day of the
conference, when that paragon of progressive politics, Yasser Arafat, took the
podium to condemn Israel as a "racist" state that "practices racism and racial
discrimination, that adopts ethnic cleansing." He called upon the meeting to
issue a condemnation of Israel, a cause backed by many in attendance — not only
the Arab states, but also Jesse Jackson and other Western leftists.
United Nations of Reparations Hypocrisy
During the era of African slavery, capturing people to sell into slavery was the
work of Africans in West Africa and of Arabs and Africans in East Africa.
Hypocrisy from the UN
The hypocrisy, so characteristic of the UN, is the reason why the racism
conference and others like it should never be taken seriously.
The United Nations works to use junk-science to justify
Nations Climate Panel: "More Politics than Science"
MIT Scientist charges United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) panel misrepresents the work of its contributing scientists to fit a
UN Appeases of Dictators
The United Nations works to treat free countries
and dictatorships as equals, thus obliterating the difference between the two
UN's "Virtue" Is Its Vice: How The United Nation's Neutrality Props Up Evil
More than 170 political leaders from around the world recently met at the United
Nations to consider what the New York Times called "the most sweeping
institutional changes" in the organization's history. But this exercise was,
predictably, hopeless. Although both detractors and defenders eagerly proposed
"reforms," they skirted the UN's insuperable problem: its corrupt "ideal" of
Irrationality of Treating Dictators as 'Rational Actors'
To acknowledge that the violation of rights is a
crime, whether by individual criminals or by the state, would call into question
the liberal's entire worldview.
Appeasement Never Works
By definition, every dictatorship's hands are drenched in blood, yet some people
still think they can be placated by simply appeasing them.
UN Undermines the
Sovereignty of Free Nations
The United Nations works to undermine the sovereignty of
free nations—in particular the United States—while morally sanctioning slave
states and dictatorships.
Playing UN "Survivor"
Survivor is a perfect microcosm for the
self-destructive nature of the recently much ballyhooed foreign-policy principle
that states that only the approval of others can grant a nation's actions moral
virtue – the principle of 'multilateralism.' 'Multilateralism' is based on the
ethics of altruism - preaching sacrifice as the supreme virtue, and
self-interest as the lowest vice. Only on this code could the great nations of
the world be called upon to lay themselves across the sacrificial altar. No
other ethics could so completely undermine a free nation's inclination to assert
its right to self-defense.
Declaration of Independence...from the United Nations
On September 12th, we had the spectacle of an American president begging the
world's favor at the United Nations.
Corruption of the Concept Sovereignty
There is only one underlying reason why the
Mandela-ites want to destroy the clear distinction between a totalitarian and a
free "sovereign" state, why they want totalitarian states to be immune from
attack and free states to be branded as evil for self-defensively attacking
those states bent on destroying them. The Mandela-ites, too, want the
destruction of the free, and subsequently prosperous, nations of the world —
from Israel and Australia to Britain and particularly America.
Must Reject the Evil Doctrine of "Multilateralism"
Military decisions are decisions about life and death—about what should be done
to protect us from enemies who seek our destruction. If our leaders are to
fulfill their obligation to defend our country, they must—starting with
Iraq—reject the poison of "multilateralism" and replace it with the virtue of
independent, rational judgment.
Bureaucratic Leftism: The United Nations vs. American Sovereignty
Forwarded by progressives and garbed in post-modern lingo, bureaucratic leftism
represents a throwback to a pre-modern age in Europe when rulers were unelected.
Today's bureaucrats effectively fill the role of yesteryear's kings.
UN vs. Rule of Law
The United Nations works to undermine representative
International Kangaroo Court
America's court system — the most fair, free and transparent in all the world —
isn't perfect. But that doesn't mean its power should be usurped by jurists
8,000 miles away who are not elected, selected or directed by anyone responsible
to American voters.
Declare Our Independence From the United Nations
The United Nations is not "dysfunctional," as some "reformists" have claimed. It
is a criminal enterprise in which no moral nation should ever participate, let
The United Nations works to control your wallet via global
the United Nations Become the Next IRS?
It is bad news when politicians in Washington make us pay taxes, but just
imagine how high taxes would climb if unaccountable international bureaucracies
had that power.